Really, could any WWE Diva withstand the amount of force and pressure Stephanie's McMahon M-A-S-S-I-V-E thighs would bring to the table if they were to be wrapped around a diva's neck as a sort of submission manuever? I HIGHLY doubt it. I mean DAMN!! Look at how HUGE they are!! Check out them DRUMSTICKS bebe!! Get a load of them HAMHOCKS!! And people thought I was exxagerating when I dubbed thee Stephanie McMahon, Stephanie "Thunder Thighs" McMahon. Once the patented Stephanie McThighlock is applied, IT'S LIGHTS OUT!! Lita BEWARE!!!
And the WWE writers thought Molly Holly had a big azz when in fact one of their own has the biggest azz of them all, not to mention biggest azz out of all the women employed by the WWE, just no one will make mention of it, unless you want to start looking through the classifieds for a new job that is. Remember, DON'T MESS WITH STEPH!! Paul Heyman should know all to well about that...
KEYS TO BEATING STEPHANIE McMAHON Back to the WWE Divas who she would pose a threat to, no need for you girls to quake in fear for Big Steph. Stephanie's athleticism (or lack thereof) isn't anything to be proud off. Considering the extra carriage she packs just about everywhere, she's wouldn't be nearly as mobile or as quick as her diva counterparts and would be vulnerable to quick attacks..... Her basic arsenal wouldn't be anything more than slapping, kicking, and the occasional hiptoss...... Don't be fooled by Stephanie's stocky build, it's nothing more than fat and genetics.... Considering how large and doughy Steph's azz is, she could use it to her advantage, perhaps in the form of Bonzai Drop or in a butthead (butting one's head with one's azz.... Do EVERYTHING you can to avoid the grasp of Stephanie's thighs, once applied, it could mean lights out (especially you Lita).... If you can make quick work of Stephanie, which actually isn't too difficult, and fend her off from the patented Stephanie McThighlock, you'll reign victorious.
PS - What in the blue hell is that thing on her thigh? That can't be underwear, otherwise she has some weirdazz underwear manufacturer. Cottage cheese perhaps? Three months later and I still don't know!!!
Yeah, Stephanie's a little heavy. Paul Heyman is fat too. So what? Neither of them are wrestlers. I don't got why people need to talk about her weight all the time.
In a way, I suppose it's because of the WWE's "Women are Objects" POV, as represented by Jerry Lawler. But, still ...
NOTE: The above post makes no sense. We apologize for the inconvenience.
When a guy is fat, it's not really that big of a deal. When a girl is fat, then there's problems. It's 10x times better to be a fat man as opposed to a fat woman. Fat guys can still get hot babes, fat women with a good looking guy, well, chances are slim to none. Hard to explain why, but's that just the way it is.
i) Stephanie McMahon ALREADY was WWF Women's Champion. And now she's a writer. I'd much rather she write the crap and stay the heck off my TV than be the Women's Champion again.
ii) What's the problem with Steph gaining a few? She has already found herself a nice man (HHH), so what's the problem with her letting herself go a bit?
iii) Paul Heyman's a fat man, and I don't see him getting swarmed with hot chicks all the time.
iv) The only point to this thread that I could find is you lobbying for the return of Mike Awesome, the Fat Chick Thriller.
The Chase Is On: 8th: Oilers [29-23-8-8] 74pts; 14 games left 14th: Flames [23-31-10-4] 60pts; 14 games left Flames must win 7 more games than the Oilers do to make playoffs Any combination of 7 Oilers wins or Flames losses eliminates them from the playoffs
So Steph has big thighs, I don't think that's a bad thing. It's better then a girl with small boney thighs.
Also, I happen to think that Steph was one of the better women's champions the WWE has had. She made people care about the title and people couldn't wait for her lose it. If Lita beat Jacqueline for the belt, you think the pop would've been as big as it was when she beat Steph?
I covered Steph's main event match in my column on the Evolution of Women's Wrestling. That match had the kind of heat behind it that wrestlers dream of. Steph was an awesome women's champ because she WASN'T a wrestler. (Not to say she can't deliver...check out her match with Trish at No Way Out in 2001). She had Honky Tonk Man heat behind her. People watched the matches so they could see her ass get kicked.
Why all the obsession with Steph anyway? Half of the threads on here mention how awful she is. I think she does a great job. If she came and knocked on my door, I'd follow her anywhere.
Originally posted by VanillaSkyBTW, who is that on top of her in that picture?
scott steiner. i'm assuming it was from that smackdown! after stephanie rode away from that week's raw in a limo with him. steiner had been apparently been promised sex in return for signing with steph's show, and he had come to receive his payment and sign the contract. um, you can't make this shit up.
Satire 03/03/03 (wienerboard.com) <- No kidding, right? Buffy 7.16 gets a 7.65372 Andrew is funny, but I'm not sure that we needed "The Andrew Episode".
Steph's far from my definition of "fat". I just think that she's better as figurehead of SmackDown right now. And be honest, do you think that she has a snowball's chance in hell against VICTORIA!?
i'm only like 2 degrees from kevin bacon... kevin was in hollow man in the pentagon scene, my good friend was in the background as an extra putting on a hooded sweatshirt... there ya go...